top of page

Disaster Preparedness Workgroup Meeting 8/20/2025

0

1

0

Stanwood-Camano Community Coalition

Notes from 8-20-25 Disaster Preparedness Workgroup Meeting

Welcome & Introductions

  • Attendees: Natalie Hagglund (SCAF), Sam Norris (Stanwood Camano Food Bank), Mary Hoffman (Stanwood-Camano School District), Bonnie Eckley (Camano Center), Rhonda Paulson (Camano Preparedness Group), Patty Nichols (Providence)



ASSUMPTIONS

Some Preparedness models

  • 4-P’s: Predict, Plan, Prepare, Practice

  • 5-types:  Prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery

  • 5-P’s of evacuation: People & Pets, Prescriptions, Papers, Personal Needs, Priceless Items

  • 3-R’s: Readiness, Response and Recovery

Major Disaster Scenarios 

  • Earthquakes

  • Floods

  • Wildfires

  • Chemical spills

  • Cyberattacks

  • Volcanoes

  • Tsunami

  • Terrorism

  • Pandemics


Six types of emergencies:

  • natural disasters

  • health emergencies

  • human-caused incidents

  • technological emergencies

  • security threats

  • workplace emergencies


Guiding Questions:

  • Which of these hazards are most likely or most concerning for Stanwood-Camano?

  • Which hazards are least addressed in current plans?

  • Are there emerging threats we should be paying more attention to? Instead of trying to plan for specific emergencies, we should be looking at common consequences and how to plan for/respond to them, such as issues with: water, power, food, communication, transportation (roads), medical 



Review of Existing Plans

Still working on acquiring all of the plans. We are unsure if each plan will include the entity’s response to the community, or if they are internally focused. We may need to also acquire operational plans.

  • Stanwood-Camano School District Emergency Plan

  • City of Stanwood Comprehensive Plan – have not acquired yet

  • Camano Preparedness Group Plan

  • Snohomish County Comprehensive Plan

  • Whidbey Island Comprehensive Plan – no cohesive plan across the county

  • Fire Department

Guiding Questions:

  • What are the key priorities or strengths of each plan?

  • Where do these plans overlap or reinforce one another?

  • Where do they differ, and could this create confusion in an emergency?

  • Are these plans coordinated with county or regional disaster planning?

    • The group wonders if all of the plans could be submitted to ChatGPT, with the questions we are looking for, for review.



Identifying Gaps in Current Efforts

Guiding Questions:

  • What parts of the community (e.g., vulnerable populations, nonprofits, businesses) are not clearly included in existing planning?

  • How well are communication systems set up between different agencies and organizations?

  • Are nonprofits and service providers identified as response partners in any of these plans?

  • Where are the biggest risks if coordination does not improve?

    • Camano Preparedness is currently focused on CERT training, Neighborhood Readiness, and Educational Opportunities. This type of focus should be replicated in Stanwood, along with more CERT opportunities, focus on reaching out to HOA’s. CPG recommends 2 months of preparedness (food, medicine, etc.) plus a little extra for neighbors.

    • Our community needs to be educated on the challenges involved with living in this area, and what they need to do to be prepared to shelter in place until help arrives (if it arrives). “What it means to live in a rural area: The risks aren’t different – the resources are.” We need to get the word out and amplify the issue.

    • We need trained shelter managers, knowledge of what buildings have generators, stored solar power, etc. We need volunteer job descriptions for when people show up to help.

    • The food bank is willing to store medical trauma supplies and water (recommended by Red Cross and FEMA), but needs funds to do so and ongoing funds to replace expired items. Also in need to funding to get their food inventory up off the floor.

    • This initiative could definitely be a good candidate for a larger grant request in order to create the community infrastructure we need.



Existing Partnerships & Coordination

Guiding Questions:

  • What partnerships or collaborations are already working well? Look at bainbridgeprepares.org and apply for their toolkit.

  • Are there examples of joint training, exercises, or shared resources?

  • Where do organizations already know how to work together?

  • What partnerships are missing or underdeveloped?



Next Steps

Guiding Questions:

  • What are the top 2–3 priorities this group should focus on in the next 6–12 months? Determine how best to organize this work. We don’t think a new nonprofit needs to be formed just for this, but a strong collaboration of volunteers through the coalition. 

  • Who else should be invited to the table (organizations or individuals not yet engaged)? PUD

  • How should we organize ongoing collaboration—regular meetings, subcommittees, training, community education? All of the above

  • What follow-up commitments are we making today?



Closing

  • Recap of discussion

  • Confirm next meeting date or follow-up process – Wednesday, October 1, 1:00pm (hopefully to discuss the Bainbridge Model)

  • Appreciation for participation


Sep 1

3 min read

0

1

0

Related Posts

Comments

Share Your ThoughtsBe the first to write a comment.
Community Coalition of Stanwood-Camano

© 2024 by Community Coaliton of Stanwood-Camano Powered and secured by Wix

Call us:

360.629.6878

Find us: Inside Stanwood-Camano Area Foundation

26911 98th Dr. NW. Ste A Stanwood WA 98292

bottom of page